JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo RIUMAComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditoresEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditores

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    DE INTERÉS

    Datos de investigaciónReglamento de ciencia abierta de la UMAPolítica de RIUMAPolitica de datos de investigación en RIUMAOpen Policy Finder (antes Sherpa-Romeo)Dulcinea
    Preguntas frecuentesManual de usoContacto/Sugerencias
    Ver ítem 
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem

    A Comparative Investigation of Cutaneous Rabbit and Funneling Tactile Illusions for Implementation in Vibrotactile Displays.

    • Autor
      Remache-Vinueza, Byron; Trujillo-León, AndrésAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Vidal-Verdú, FernandoAutoridad Universidad de Málaga
    • Fecha
      2024-06-19
    • Editorial/Editor
      IEEE
    • Palabras clave
      Tacto; Psicología fisiológica; Ingeniería biomédica
    • Resumen
      We designed two psychophysical experiments to compare the cutaneous rabbit tactile illusion with a cutaneous rabbit recreated using sequential funneling tactile illusions. These illusions were rendered between a pair of actuators held with the hands. A tactile illusion is a psychophysical phenomenon that arises when the real stimulus does not match the perceived sensation. Designers exploit tactile illusions to efficiently increase the resolution of vibrotactile displays for human-computer interaction applications. Initially, participants qualitatively compared both rendering methods. Subsequently, individuals reported the upper threshold of the Inter-Stimulus Onset Interval (ISOI) for the cutaneous rabbit and the Time Between Funneling (TBF) illusions of the recreated cutaneous rabbit using funneling, when the illusion broke apart. The primary differences reported between both methods for rendering the cutaneous rabbit illusion were related to the perceived amount of jumps and duration. Overall, funneling performed better at evoking the illusion of a hopping rabbit, while both methods effectively conveyed direction sensations. Finally, the upper ISOI threshold we found for the cutaneous rabbit was consistent with the value reported in the literature, approximately 190 milliseconds, and was surpassed by the TBF of the recreated cutaneous rabbit using funneling.
    • URI
      https://hdl.handle.net/10630/36596
    • DOI
      https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416741
    • Compartir
      RefworksMendeley
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros
    A_Comparative_Investigation_of_Cutaneous_Rabbit_and_Funneling_Tactile_Illusions_for_Implementation_in_Vibrotactile_Displays.pdf (1.273Mb)
    Colecciones
    • Artículos

    Estadísticas

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
     

     

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA