JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo RIUMAComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditoresEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditores

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    DE INTERÉS

    Datos de investigaciónReglamento de ciencia abierta de la UMAPolítica de RIUMAPolitica de datos de investigación en RIUMAOpen Policy Finder (antes Sherpa-Romeo)Dulcinea
    Preguntas frecuentesManual de usoContacto/Sugerencias
    Ver ítem 
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem

    Comparison and Computational Performance of Tsunami-HySEA and MOST Models for LANTEX 2013 Scenario: Impact Assessment on Puerto Rico Coasts.

    • Autor
      Macías-Sánchez, JorgeAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Mercado, Aurelio; González-Vida, José ManuelAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Ortega-Acosta, SergioAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Castro-Díaz, Manuel JesúsAutoridad Universidad de Málaga
    • Fecha
      2016
    • Editorial/Editor
      Springer Nature
    • Palabras clave
      Maremotos
    • Resumen
      HySEA tsunami model is used to simulate the Caribbean LANTEX 2013 scenario. The numerical simulation of the propagation and inundation phases is performed with a single integrated model but using different mesh resolutions and nested meshes. Special emphasis is put on assessing the most exposed coastal areas at Puerto Rico affected by this event. Comparisons with MOST are made considering both time series at different locations, and inundation maps. Both models compare well for propagating tsunami waves in open sea, producing very similar results. The main discrepancies are observed in coastal areas, where maximum wave height provided by the propagation module of MOST is different from the one provided by HySEA. The main reason is that, while HySEA always compute inundation effects, MOST propagation does not include runup physics and locates an artificial numerical reflecting wall at a certain depth (typically 20 m). Henceforth, in nearshore shallow waters HySEA should be compared with the inundation version of MOST. Nevertheless the most striking difference resides in computational time; HySEA is coded using the advantages of GPU architecture, and can produce a 4 hour simulation in a 60 arc-sec resolution for the whole Caribbean Sea in less than 4 min with a single GPU and as fast as 11 seconds with 32 GPUs. When details about the inundation must be simulated, a 1 arc-sec (approximately 30 m) inundation resolution mesh covering all of Puerto Rico, an island with dimensions of 160 km east-west and 56 km north-south, is used, and a three level nested meshes technique implemented. In this case approximately 11 hours of wall clock time are needed for a 2 hour simulation in a single GPU.
    • URI
      https://hdl.handle.net/10630/37399
    • DOI
      https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1387-8
    • Compartir
      RefworksMendeley
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros
    Articulo_lantex_2013_vfinal2.pdf (163.6Kb)
    Articulo_LANTEX_2013_vfinal_FIGURAS.pdf (45.96Mb)
    Colecciones
    • Artículos

    Estadísticas

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
     

     

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA