This research analysed the distribution of publicly awarded funding, by United Kingdom
Research and Innovation (UKRI) to defined University Groups and compared it against the aim
and objectives of UKRI’s Equality, Diversity, and Inclusivity (EDI) strategy. Previous work has
identified failures in the allocation of research awards, with some groups being under-represented
in successful bids. UKRI have acknowledged that the situation needs to improve yet concern exists
over whether change has been enacted. Publicly accessible information provided freely by UKRI was
used in conducting a comprehensive analysis of the current position. The results showed that the
marginalisation of groups applies at a University Group level, with over-representation of the elite
universities of the Russell Group in successfully funded project bids. The data show how, both in
total financial expenditure and in the number of projects financed, the awarding of research funding
to the universities with the largest popular base, namely the group identified as Post-92 universities,
is relatively very small. These universities, as identified by measurements such as social inclusion
within university rankings, contribute to greater equality of opportunities for student populations
and reduce the impact of economic discrimination. By greatly minoritising the Post-92 universities
through funding, UKRI is effectively reducing access for their disadvantaged students.
