Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAranda-Gallardo, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Asencio, José Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorCanca-Sánchez, José Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorBarrero-Sojo, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Jiménez, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Fernández, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorEnríquez-de-Luna, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorMoya-Suárez, Ana Belén
dc.contributor.authorMora-Banderas, Ana María 
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-28T09:51:15Z
dc.date.available2013-10-28T09:51:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationAranda Gallardo M, Morales Asencio JM, Canca Sánchez JC, Mora Banderas AM, Moya Suárez AB, Barrero Sojo S, Pérez Jiménez C, Morales Fernández A, Enríquez de Luna Rodríguez M, Saldaña del Campo S. Instruments for assessing the risk of falls in hospitalised patients: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Research. 2013; 13: 122es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10630/6172
dc.description.abstractBackground Falls are a serious problem for hospitalized patients, reducing the duration and quality of life. It is estimated that over 84% of all adverse events in hospitalized patients are related to falls. Some fall risk assessment tools have been developed and tested in environments other than those for which they were developed with serious validity discrepancies. The aim of this review is to determine the accuracy of instruments for detecting fall risk and predicting falls in acute hospitalized patients. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis. Main databases, related websites and grey literature were searched. Two blinded reviewers evaluated title and abstracts of the selected articles and, if they met inclusion criteria, methodological quality was assessed in a new blinded process. Meta-analyses of diagnostic ORs (DOR) and likelihood (LH) coefficients were performed with the random effects method. Forest plots were calculated for sensitivity and specificity, DOR and LH. Additionally, summary ROC (SROC) curves were calculated for every analysis. Results Fourteen studies were selected for the review. The meta-analysis was performed with the Morse (MFS), STRATIFY and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model scales. The STRATIFY tool provided greater diagnostic validity, with a DOR value of 7.64 (4.86 - 12.00). A meta-regression was performed to assess the effect of average patient age over 65 years and the performance or otherwise of risk reassessments during the patient’s stay. The reassessment showed a significant reduction in the DOR on the MFS (rDOR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64 - 0.89, p = 0.017). Conclusions The STRATIFY scale was found to be the best tool for assessing the risk of falls by hospitalized acutely-ill adults. However, the behaviour of these instruments varies considerably depending on the population and the environment, and so their operation should be tested prior to implementation. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of the reassessment of these instruments with respect to hospitalized adult patients, and to consider the real compliance by healthcare personnel with procedures related to patient safety, and in particular concerning the prevention of falls.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMCes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAsistencia sanitariaes_ES
dc.subjectAccidenteses_ES
dc.subject.otherAccidental fallses_ES
dc.subject.otherAdverse eventses_ES
dc.subject.otherClinical safetyes_ES
dc.subject.otherRisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subject.otherInpatientses_ES
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewes_ES
dc.subject.otherNursing assessmentes_ES
dc.titleInstruments for assessing the risk of falls in acute hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem