Validity of the new backache index (BAI) in patients with low back pain
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Authors
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Share
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Backache-Index (BAI) is applied to patients with low back pain (LBP) in order
to help doctors/surgeons perform physical examinations easily and it is carried out within a short
space of time (< 2 min.) without using inclinometric instruments.
PURPOSE/AIM: To explore reliability, validity and responsiveness of the BAI in patients with LBP,
which can fulfil the existing need for a reliable routine examination in the clinical environment.
MATERIALS & METHODS: In total, 75 patients with subacute LBP participated in a randomized
controlled study (1). The BAI consisted of a scoring system that includes pain factors and stiffness
estimation at the end of a series of five different lumbar movements of a patient standing in erect
position.
RESULTS: The (blinded) inter-observer reliability between 2 observers for the BAI was perfect (ICC =
0.96). A BAI change of one unit is able to exclude a measurement error. A significantly good
correlation (P < 0.001) was found between BAI at baseline, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, R =
0.62) and MPQ-PRIT, as the total degree of pain rating index (R = 0.57). The effect size and
discriminative ability were explored after two treatment sessions. The greatest level of distinction was
found for MPQ-PRI-T and BAI (AUC > 0.93), followed by ODI (AUC = 0.92). A less distinction was
found for MPQ-NWC-T and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, AUC > 0.82).
RELEVANCE: the BAI is available in different languages: English, Spanish, French, Dutch, German,
ITALIAN, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Hebrew, Chinese, Japanese and Thais.
www.roptrotherapy.info
CONCLUSIONS: The Backache Index or BAI appears to be a reliable and valid assessment of overall
restricted spinal movements in case of LBP and discriminates between successful and unsuccessful
treatment outcome.
DISCUSSION: The inter-observer reliability after a few minutes for the BAI was sufficient. The validity
of the BAI was found to be good with the ODI and moderate with the VAS. A Backache Index change
of one unit is able to exclude a measurement error.
KEYWORDS: Low back pain; Outcome scales; Reliability; Validity; Impairment; Pain rating scales.
IMPLICATIONS: In a Spanish study (2) the test-retest after 3 days of the same group (n=46) revailed
that the reliability for the 5 outcome scores was good (ICC=0.73). No significant difference was found
between BAI1 (4.65 ± 4.15 ) and BAI2 (4.72 ± 4.20) and the absolute reliability was perfect with an
ICC=0.97.









