Validity of the new backache index (BAI) in patients with low back pain
| dc.centro | Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Farasyn, A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-22T09:27:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-10-22T09:27:17Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2013 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-10-22 | |
| dc.departamento | Fisioterapia | |
| dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: The Backache-Index (BAI) is applied to patients with low back pain (LBP) in order to help doctors/surgeons perform physical examinations easily and it is carried out within a short space of time (< 2 min.) without using inclinometric instruments. PURPOSE/AIM: To explore reliability, validity and responsiveness of the BAI in patients with LBP, which can fulfil the existing need for a reliable routine examination in the clinical environment. MATERIALS & METHODS: In total, 75 patients with subacute LBP participated in a randomized controlled study (1). The BAI consisted of a scoring system that includes pain factors and stiffness estimation at the end of a series of five different lumbar movements of a patient standing in erect position. RESULTS: The (blinded) inter-observer reliability between 2 observers for the BAI was perfect (ICC = 0.96). A BAI change of one unit is able to exclude a measurement error. A significantly good correlation (P < 0.001) was found between BAI at baseline, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, R = 0.62) and MPQ-PRIT, as the total degree of pain rating index (R = 0.57). The effect size and discriminative ability were explored after two treatment sessions. The greatest level of distinction was found for MPQ-PRI-T and BAI (AUC > 0.93), followed by ODI (AUC = 0.92). A less distinction was found for MPQ-NWC-T and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, AUC > 0.82). RELEVANCE: the BAI is available in different languages: English, Spanish, French, Dutch, German, ITALIAN, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Hebrew, Chinese, Japanese and Thais. www.roptrotherapy.info CONCLUSIONS: The Backache Index or BAI appears to be a reliable and valid assessment of overall restricted spinal movements in case of LBP and discriminates between successful and unsuccessful treatment outcome. DISCUSSION: The inter-observer reliability after a few minutes for the BAI was sufficient. The validity of the BAI was found to be good with the ODI and moderate with the VAS. A Backache Index change of one unit is able to exclude a measurement error. KEYWORDS: Low back pain; Outcome scales; Reliability; Validity; Impairment; Pain rating scales. IMPLICATIONS: In a Spanish study (2) the test-retest after 3 days of the same group (n=46) revailed that the reliability for the 5 outcome scores was good (ICC=0.73). No significant difference was found between BAI1 (4.65 ± 4.15 ) and BAI2 (4.72 ± 4.20) and the absolute reliability was perfect with an ICC=0.97. | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10630/8280 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.relation.eventdate | Octubre 2013 | es_ES |
| dc.relation.eventplace | Dubai | es_ES |
| dc.relation.eventtitle | Congress on low back & Pelvic Pain | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Lumbalgia | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Validity | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Backache | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Index | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Pain | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Low back | es_ES |
| dc.title | Validity of the new backache index (BAI) in patients with low back pain | es_ES |
| dc.type | conference output | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 94126d4b-371d-4727-a252-f4182972d4b6 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1

