On the Urea Action Mechanism: A Comparative Study on the Self-Assembly of Two Sugar-Based Surfactants.

dc.contributor.authorHierrezuelo-Osorio, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Bolivar, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCarnero-Ruiz, Cristóbal
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T16:21:17Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T16:21:17Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-24
dc.departamentoDidáctica de la Matemática, de las Ciencias Sociales y de las Ciencias Experimentales
dc.descriptionhttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/21299?template=romeoes_ES
dc.description.abstractStudies on the effect of urea on micelle formation and structure of n-octyl- -D-thioglucoside (OTG) and N-decanoyl-N-methylglucamide (MEGA-10) were carried out by using the steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence techniques, together with combined static and dynamic light scattering measurements. A similar increase in the critical micelle concentration with the urea addition was observed for both surfactants. This behavior was attributed to a rise in the solubility of hydrocarbon tails and the increase of solvation of the headgroup of the surfactants in the presence of urea. Structural studies mainly based on the analysis of the hydrodynamic radius and aggregation number of micelles revealed that urea induces changes much more significant on micelles of OTG. Particularly, it was found that, whereas the surface area per headgroup of OTG increases with the urea concentration, it does decrease in the case of MEGA-10. This fact suggests that different action mechanisms operate for both surfactants. Accordingly, investigations on the micellar microstructure based on the study of microenvironmental properties such as micropolarity and microviscosity also indicated a more pronounced effect in the case of OTG. Although changes were not observed in the hydrophobic inner region of both micellar systems, a significant increase of polarity and viscosity in the micellar interface of OTG suggests a direct participation of urea in the micellar solvation layer. The differences between the observed behaviors for both micellar systems were interpreted on the basis of two features: the weaker hydration and greater rigidity of the OTG headgroup as compared with MEGA-10.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationJ. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 20, 7178–7187es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/jp811198d
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/33298
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherACSes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectFluorescenciaes_ES
dc.subjectMicelases_ES
dc.subjectAgentes tensioactivoses_ES
dc.subject.otherFluorescencees_ES
dc.subject.otherMicelleses_ES
dc.subject.otherSurfactantses_ES
dc.titleOn the Urea Action Mechanism: A Comparative Study on the Self-Assembly of Two Sugar-Based Surfactants.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationec508df7-d5c0-45ba-b221-641276d30f05
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4c2a960b-a9b5-49b7-b37f-881fc8df7f94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryec508df7-d5c0-45ba-b221-641276d30f05

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JPhysB_2009.pdf
Size:
444.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections