The influence of rehydration technique on the response of recalcitrant seed embryos to desiccation
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Reading date
Collaborators
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Share
Center
Department/Institute
Keywords
Abstract
The concept of ‘imbibitional damage’ arose when it was observed that considerable leakage of cell contents could occur when dry seed or pollen tissues are plunged directly into water. It is now common practice to imbibe dehydrated tissue slowly, to permit the re-establishment of functional membranes, prior to placing the tissue into liquid water. However, this argument may not hold if the tissue of interest is inherently desiccation-sensitive. Slow drying of desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds or
excised embryonic axes results in damage at high water contents, because it permits time for aqueous-based deleterious processes to occur. The same argument may apply if partially dried material is re-imbibed slowly, as this technique will also expose the tissue to intermediate water contents for protracted periods. This hypothesis was tested using embryos or axes from seeds of three recalcitrant species (Artocarpus heterophyllus, Podocarpus henkelii and Ekebergia capensis). Excised
material was rapidly dried to water contents within the range over which viability is lost during drying, and re-imbibed either rapidly, by plunging directly into water, or slowly, by placing the material on damp filter paper or exposing it to a saturated atmosphere for several hours. Although details of the response differed among species and developmental stage, in all cases direct re-imbibition in water resulted in higher (or similar, but never lower) survival than either of the slow rehydration techniques.
Description
Según se especifica en :https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/open-research/preprint-policy:
A ‘preprint’ is an early version of a manuscript, created prior to the version submitted for publication. Cambridge's preprint policy permits you to share any pre-submission version of your manuscript anywhere, at any time, under any licence.
It is best practice to link preprints to the final published work (the ‘Version of Record’). If you have posted your preprint online, we encourage you to cite your preprint in your submitted manuscript, including details such as a DOI or other persistent identifier. If your manuscript is accepted and published by Cambridge, we also encourage you to update your preprint’s records to link it to your final published Version of Record, using a DOI and URL to link to the version published by Cambridge.
(DOI)
Bibliographic citation
Perán R, Pammenter NW, Naicker J, Berjak P. The influence of rehydration technique on the response of recalcitrant seed embryos to desiccation. Seed Science Research. 2004;14(2):179-184. doi:10.1079/SSR2004167
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced by
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional












